Industry sector · NAICS 23

Construction

H-1B wages, OSHA safety and layoff activity across 35,037 employers in Construction.

35,037
Employers
$100,000
Median H-1B wage
1,996
H-1B filings

The sector at a glance

Construction spans 35,037 tracked employers, with a $100,000 median H-1B wage and 1,996 H-1B filings on record, against an average DART injury rate of 3.58.

35,037
employers
$100,000
median H-1B wage
1,996
H-1B filings
3.58
avg DART injury rate

What the data says about this industry

Industry pages on PlainEmployers exist to answer one question that a single employer profile cannot: is what you are seeing at one company normal for its sector, or an outlier? Every figure below is computed from the same three federal datasets that power individual profiles, the Department of Labor H-1B disclosures, OSHA injury records, and state WARN Act notices, aggregated across every employer we map to this industry. Read the sector numbers first, then judge any one employer against them.

PlainEmployers tracks 35,037 distinct employers operating in the Construction sector (NAICS prefix 23), each pulled from U.S. Department of Labor and OSHA public disclosures rather than self-reported corporate profiles. The median wage disclosed on H-1B visa petitions in this industry is $100,000, computed from individual position-level filings (which must meet or exceed the DOL-set prevailing wage). In aggregate, Construction employers have filed 1,996 H-1B labor condition applications, averaging about 0 per employer.

On workplace safety, the Construction peer group shows an average DART rate of 3.58 injuries per 100 full-time workers, a standardized OSHA metric counting days away, restricted duty, or job transfer from workplace injuries. That number is the benchmark every individual employer profile is scored against, so an employer with a DART of 3.5 against a 2.0 industry average is running roughly 75% above the norm. The metric self-corrects for company size, which is why it is more meaningful than raw injury counts: a 300,000-worker retailer and a 400-worker machine shop can be compared on equal footing, and industry-wide patterns (construction and warehousing skewing high, finance and professional services skewing low) are visible here.

Among the largest visa sponsors in Construction currently indexed are California Department of Transportation, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc., CORE TECH CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, each with a dedicated profile covering salary breakdowns, OSHA safety grade, and WARN Act layoff history. Jobseekers researching this sector should cross-reference the wage numbers here with metro-level pages, because H-1B wages are legally tied to the prevailing wage for the specific metro-occupation combination: a software engineer in San Francisco and one in Nashville show materially different disclosed salaries for the same role. The ETL pipeline re-pulls federal and state disclosures on a recurring schedule, so the employer list, wage figures, and safety benchmarks here refresh as new public filings are released.

Industry-level totals combine every employer record mapped to this sector, drawn from WARN Act notices and US Department of Labor filings. They are most useful for spotting trends and comparing sectors, and least useful for judging any single employer within the industry: a high sector total does not mean every firm is cutting jobs, and a low total does not rule out significant layoffs at individual companies. Where an employer spans multiple sectors it is assigned to its primary activity. Treat these aggregates as a starting point, then drill into the individual employer records and the source filings before drawing conclusions.

Top employers in Construction

# Employer H-1B filingsMedian wage
1 California Department of Transportation CA 69 $94,831
2 Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. TX 55 -
3 CORE TECH CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION GU 50 -
4 DPR Construction, A General Partnership CA 38 $108,898
5 Kiewit Engineering Group Inc. NE 29 $126,063
6 Guam Ukudu Power, LLC GU 26 $75,209
7 HITACHI ENERGY USA INC. NC 25 $121,287
8 M. A. Mortenson Company MN 23 $114,980
9 Black Construction Corporation GU 21 $55,465
10 MOSS & ASSOCIATES, LLC FL 21 $93,664
11 Fluor Enterprises, Inc. TX 19 $114,776
12 CSS PAYROLL CO, L.P. CA 18 $202,591
13 Trenmor LLC NY 17 $119,150
14 Clayco, Inc. MO 16 $102,070
15 CORE TECH INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION GU 16 $76,325
16 Meilbert De Vera Lopez GU 16 $47,866
17 Sunrun, Inc. CA 15 $201,758
18 MASTEC SERVICES COMPANY, INC FL 14 $99,736
19 Jacobs Project Management Company TX 13 $121,695
20 Lennar Corporation FL 13 $170,631
21 SUMITOMO MITSUI CONSTRUCTION CO., LTD. GU 13 $50,400
22 Nan Inc GU 11 $66,273
23 Turner Construction Company NY 11 $130,619
24 HDCC Guam, LLC GU 10 $83,628
25 Pacific Rim Constructors, Inc. GU 10 $70,800

What this means for Construction jobseekers

Use Construction's $100,000 median and 3.58 average DART rate as the yardstick for any single employer in the sector.

  • A $100,000 sector median means an employer paying well below it is worth a second look, compare directly. Compare employers
  • An employer’s DART rate above 3.58 runs higher than the Construction norm; read its grade in context. How grades work
  • Wages are tied to the metro prevailing wage, so cross-reference the metro page for the same role. Browse metros

Sector totals combine every employer mapped to this industry's primary activity; multi-sector firms are counted once.